November 4, 2024

Deabruak

The business lovers

FT Executive Education Rankings 2020: methodology and key

This is the 22nd version of the Economic Moments rankings of the world’s foremost companies of customised and open-enrolment government education programmes.

The customised ranking attributes the prime eighty five company educational institutions — these are courses customized to the teaching wants of the organisations that commission them. The 2nd ranking contains the prime seventy five educational institutions for open-enrolment programmes — courses on certain subject areas, this sort of as management, that are directed in direction of gurus irrespective of their employer. A 3rd, merged ranking lists the prime fifty educational institutions for government education, calculated from the customised and open tables.

Colleges getting component have to be internationally accredited by either Equis or AACSB and have earned revenues of at least $2m in 2019 from either their customised or open-enrolment non-degree programmes. This year, a total of 107 educational institutions took component in either or both of those rankings.

The ranking of customised class companies is compiled utilizing details from the company educational institutions and their company shoppers in 2019. Each college have to nominate a minimal of twenty shoppers. At least 5 of them have to entire the FT study for a college to be eligible for the remaining ranking.

The FT study was concluded by one,a hundred thirty five company college shoppers this calendar year — a response rate of fifty six for each cent. Each rated their programme on a ten-position scale according to a range of indicators. Their responses specifically inform the very first ten of the ranking’s conditions, from class design to comply with-up and future use, which account for a merged 80 for each cent of the ranking’s bodyweight.

Customer responses are weighted according to programme form. Customers decide on a single of three choices to categorise their programme: strategic (delivered to prime management and created to impact a company’s route) basic (delivered to management on operational facets of a firm) or functional (associated to a certain function, this sort of as internet marketing). Strategic programmes have the premier weighting and as a result the finest effect on the ranking.

Responses are also weighted according to the seniority of the particular person liable for specifying the class, the dimensions of the customer organisation and the amount of educational institutions with which that customer has commissioned customised courses in the earlier three several years.

The last 5 conditions are calculated from information and facts presented by educational institutions on intercontinental shoppers, abroad programmes, progress, lover educational institutions and college range.

The open-enrolment ranking is compiled utilizing details from class companies and people who concluded their nominated management programmes in 2019. Colleges submit one or two basic courses of at least three times in duration and a single or two innovative courses of at least 5 times. At least twenty for each cent of these programmes’ members have to entire the FT study, with a minimal of twenty concluded surveys, for a college to be deemed in the remaining ranking.

A total of five,480 members answered this year’s open programme study — a response rate of 37 for each cent — ranking components of their class on a ten-position scale. Responses by innovative and basic-amount members are merged to compute the very first ten ranking conditions.

These conditions, which involve the quality of the members, of the teaching and the relevance of the skills they obtained, inform 80 for each cent of the ranking. School details are used to compute the remaining conditions on woman and intercontinental members, progress, intercontinental location and lover educational institutions.

For both of those rankings, information and facts collected in the preceding two several years is used, exactly where obtainable, to compute conditions knowledgeable by customer and participant responses. If a college has participated for the earlier three several years, the weighting is forty:33:27, with 2020 details counting for forty for each cent. If two several years of information and facts is obtainable, the weighting is fifty five:45, with 2020 details accounting for fifty five for each cent.

The weightings accorded to the very first nine and ten conditions in the customised and open rankings, respectively, are decided by the amount of relevance shoppers and members attach to every in their surveys for the 2020 ranking. Weightings for these conditions as a result fluctuate slightly from calendar year to calendar year.

Colleges that characteristic in both of those rankings are eligible for the merged general ranking. The prime fifty educational institutions are calculated according to an equal weighting of the total scores realized in both of those rankings, alternatively than an common of ranking positions.

Judith Pizer of Pizer-MacMillan acted as the FT’s database specialist

Crucial: Customised-enrolment programme

(weights for ranking conditions are shown in brackets as a proportion of the general ranking)

The very first ten conditions, up to and together with “Future use”, are dependent on details from the companies that commissioned government courses.

The future 5 are dependent on details claimed by company educational institutions. Colleges are ranked for every of these conditions. The last classification, “Total responses‡”, is for information and facts only and does not inform the ranking.

Figures in brackets display the bodyweight every criterion contributes to the general ranking. The weighting accorded to the very first nine conditions, from planning to value for money, accounts for 80 for each cent of the total ranking’s bodyweight. It is decided by the level of relevance that shoppers attach to every.

Preparing (eight.three): amount of conversation in between customer and college, the extent to which clients’ strategies were integrated into the programme, and the effectiveness of the college in integrating its hottest study.

Programme design (eight.4): adaptability of the class and the willingness of educational institutions to complement their college with exterior specialists.

Educating approaches and materials (7.9): extent to which teaching approaches and materials were modern day and ideal, and involved a acceptable combine of educational rigour and useful relevance.

School (eight.4): quality of teaching and the extent to which teaching staff members worked jointly to present a coherent programme.

New skills and studying (eight.three): relevance of skills obtained to the workplace, the simplicity with which they were implemented, and the extent to which the course encouraged new ways of imagining.

Adhere to-up (7.three): extent and effectiveness of comply with-up provided just after the class members returned to their workplaces.

Aims realized (eight.4): extent to which educational and company anticipations were met, and the quality of suggestions from particular person members to class commissioners.

Facilities (7.4): ranking of the studying environment’s quality and convenience, and of supporting sources and services.

Price for money (7.7): clients’ ranking of the programme’s design, teaching and materials in phrases of value for money.

Upcoming use (eight.): probability that shoppers would reuse the similar college for other customised programmes in the future, and whether they would recommission the similar programme.

International shoppers (five.): dependent on the proportion of shoppers with headquarters outside the house the company school’s foundation country and area.

Overseas programmes (2.): intercontinental access of the school’s customised programme teaching.

Development (five.): dependent on the general progress in revenues from customised programmes as very well as the progress in revenues from repeat company.

Partner educational institutions (three.): amount and quality of programmes developed or taught in conjunction with other Equis or Association to Progress Collegiate Colleges of Organization (AACSB) accredited company educational institutions.

School range (five.): range of college college according to citizenship and gender.

Total responses: amount of particular person surveys concluded by the school’s shoppers. Figures in brackets reveal the amount of several years of study details counted in direction of the ranking.

Crucial: Open up-enrolment programme

(weights for ranking conditions are shown in brackets as a proportion of the general ranking)

The very first ten conditions are dependent on details from programme members the future six are dependent on details submitted by the company educational institutions. Ranks are shown for every of these conditions, apart from “Female participants”, which exhibits the proportion. Figures in brackets display the bodyweight every criterion contributes to the general ranking. The weighting accorded to the very first ten conditions, from planning to services, accounts for 80 for each cent of the total ranking’s bodyweight. It is decided by the amount of relevance that members attach to every.

Preparing (7.7): provision of innovative information and facts on programme content, and the participant assortment approach.

Course design (eight.six): adaptability of the class and appropriateness of course dimensions, construction and design.

Educating approaches and materials (eight.three): extent to which teaching approaches and materials were modern day and ideal, and involved a acceptable combine of educational rigour and useful relevance.

School (eight.7): quality of the teaching and the extent to which teaching staff members worked jointly to present a coherent programme.

High-quality of members (7.9): extent to which other members were of the ideal managerial and educational typical, the intercontinental range of members and the quality of conversation among the friends.

New skills and studying (eight.7): relevance of skills obtained to the workplace, the simplicity with which they were implemented, and the extent to which the class inspired new ways of imagining.

Adhere to-up (7.three): amount of comply with-up provided just after members returned to their workplaces, and networking possibilities with fellow members.

Aims realized (eight.4): extent to which individual and expert anticipations were met, and the probability that members would suggest the programme.

Foods and lodging (six.eight): ranking of the quality of foods and lodging.

Facilities (7.six): ranking of the studying environment’s quality and convenience, and of supporting sources and services.

Feminine members (2.): proportion of woman class members.

International members (three.): dependent on the proportion of members from outside the house the company school’s foundation country and area.

International location (2.): extent to which programmes are operate outside the house the school’s foundation country and area.

Development (five.): dependent on the general progress in revenues from open programmes as very well as the progress in revenues from repeat company.

Partner educational institutions (three.): amount and quality of programmes taught in conjunction with other Equis or AACSB accredited company educational institutions.

School range (five.): range of college college according to citizenship and gender.